January 15, 2026 by Medigroup
Running a physician office, clinic, urgent care center, or surgery center in 2026 can feel like trying to hold margins steady while costs quietly climb in the background. That pressure is well documented. An MGMA Stat poll found that 90% of medical groups reported year-to-date operating costs were higher than the same point in 2024, underscoring that cost escalation is not isolated or temporary (MGMA). At the same time, forward-looking data suggests relief is unlikely in the near term. Vizient projects 2026 supply chain prices will rise by 2.41%, with pharmaceutical costs increasing by 3.35%, driven by ongoing inflationary and utilization pressures (Vizient).
The good news is that outpatient facilities are not powerless. While physician offices and surgery centers may not purchase at hospital scale, they do have meaningful leverage. Facilities that operate with discipline—clear spend visibility, consistent vendor compliance, and structured decision-making—can reduce waste, strengthen negotiating positions, and eliminate “silent leaks” such as off-contract purchasing and unnoticed service renewals.
This guide focuses on healthcare cost management, practical cost savings in healthcare, and proven healthcare cost reduction strategies designed specifically for outpatient facilities—not hospitals.
Cost reduction efforts fail most often when leaders attempt to negotiate without a full picture of their spending. To avoid negotiating blind, outpatient facilities should start by pulling 12 months of purchasing data from accounts payable systems, distributors, purchasing cards, and service invoices. That data should then be organized into clear categories such as clinical supplies, procedural packs and kits, sterile processing, lab and imaging, office and IT supplies, pharmaceuticals or injectables (if applicable), capital equipment, and service contracts.
Once categorized, leadership should be able to answer three foundational questions with confidence:
That final question is particularly important. Price variance is often the clearest indicator of opportunity, signaling outdated contracts, inconsistent compliance, or decentralized purchasing habits that quietly inflate costs over time.
Rising cost forecasts should inform planning—not justify inaction. When supply and pharmaceutical inflation are expected, the facilities that perform best are those that tighten controls before increases take effect. 2026 projections are best treated as beacons for goal-setting, not numbers to absorb passively.
For many outpatient facilities, this translates into practical, achievable targets such as offsetting 2–4% of supply inflation through improved contracting and compliance alone and reducing waste or expirations by 10–20% in high-variance categories like consumables, injectables, and kits.
Too often, vendor negotiations focus narrowly on unit price. While pricing matters, it is frequently the terms that determine total cost over a year. Freight charges, minimum order thresholds, restocking fees, and substitution policies can easily erase the value of a favorable price if they are not addressed upfront.
Effective healthcare cost reduction strategies prioritize:

Approaching negotiations with a calm, data-backed posture is key. Facilities are not asking for concessions—they are offering predictable volume, streamlined ordering, and long-term relationships. Contracts should reflect that stability.
Off-contract purchasing is rarely malicious. It often stems from urgency, backorders, staff turnover, or long-standing preferences. Over time, however, it fragments spending and undermines negotiated pricing—especially when the same category is sourced from multiple vendors at varying prices.
Facilities that control this drift typically:
For smaller organizations, this is often where a GPO partner such as MediGroup adds value by connecting your facility with vendors who can help provide structure and accountability needed to avoid maverick spending without overloading internal teams.
Even outside hospital settings, understanding site-of-care pricing dynamics matters. Research from the Health Care Cost Institute shows that the same services are often priced higher in hospital outpatient departments than in physician offices, largely due to facility fees (HCCI). For outpatient operators, this reinforces the importance of how services are structured, billed, and contracted—because affordability and patient perception can change even when care quality does not.
Standardization does not mean defaulting to the cheapest option. It means intentionally reducing unnecessary variation. The fastest and least disruptive wins typically come from high-volume, low-clinical-risk categories such as exam gloves, syringes, disinfectants, prep supplies, and basic wound care. Procedural packs and kits also offer significant opportunity, particularly in surgery centers and procedural clinics.
A practical standardization framework asks three questions:
Most supply waste is systemic, not behavioral. Overstocking, expired items, and duplicated inventory often result from unclear par levels or inconsistent replenishment. Outpatient facilities commonly reduce waste by implementing structured par levels, two-bin systems for routine supplies, regular cycle counts in high-risk categories, and procedure-based picking using case carts or kits.
These changes rarely affect clinical care, yet they produce steady, compounding savings.
Supply disruptions do more than delay care—they drive premium shipping, forced substitutions, and off-contract buying. ECRI has noted growing concern around tariffs and global instability affecting pricing and availability of critical supplies such as PPE (ECRI). Facilities that pre-approve substitutes, dual-source critical items, and maintain a short monthly “risk list” are better positioned to control costs when disruptions occur.
Surgery centers and clinics often purchase equipment based on projected growth that never fully materializes. Before committing capital, facilities should review actual utilization over the prior 12–18 months, estimate total cost of ownership—including maintenance and downtime—and compare repair history to replacement timing. This prevents carrying unnecessary depreciation and service expenses.
Service contracts frequently renew automatically at higher rates. Facilities that maintain a centralized inventory of agreements, compare costs to actual service usage, and require transparent performance metrics are far better positioned to right-size coverage. One overlooked auto-renewal can undo months of supply-side savings.
Start with the top 5 vendors and top 50 SKUs. Identify price variance, cut off-contract buying for routine items, and renegotiate freight/minimums.
Both—but compliance usually comes first. Great pricing doesn’t matter if purchasing keeps drifting off-contract.
Standardize low-controversy categories first, use a clinical equivalency approach, and document exceptions clearly.
With operating costs rising across the industry and inflationary pressure expected to persist, confidence in 2026 will belong to facilities that treat procurement as a system—not a reaction. Clean spending visibility, disciplined contracting, consistent compliance, thoughtful standardization, and data-driven capital planning create sustainable savings without sacrificing care.
For outpatient organizations seeking to implement this approach efficiently, MediGroup helps facilities focus on the highest-impact opportunities and uncover savings opportunities from a position of clarity and control rather than urgency.